This article points out that there is no license fee required if you have no 
fees on your content.  So, for instance, u-toob pays no license fees.

But you are right.  This could be an attempt by Google to force a 
re-examination of the H.264 royalty schemes.

Amusing that Firefox on Windows can play H.264 using a plug-in from Microsoft 
(the latter presumably picking up the tab for the royalties).  I think this is 
the same situation on OS X, that Safari just uses the built-in Quicktime H.264 
CODEC, for which Apple have already picked up the royalty tab.

[Interestingly, I had to recently buy an MPEG-2 codec (as a plug-in for 
Quicktime).  Apparently this is the format used by video on my DVR  (what the 
difference is between mp4 and mp2 is, I do not know).  I'm sure Verizon don't 
realize this, or they would want to bill me extra for it, but I can plug my mac 
into the firewire jack on my Verizon DVR and 'record' to my Mac's hard drive, 
digital video of whatever is playing.  I wanted to preserve the clip from the 
NBC coverage of the IronMan Championships where Neil was shown for her 
'Nanosecond of Fame'.]

On 2011-01-13, at 14:04, Henry Minsky wrote:

> maybe it will cause the MPEG licensing association to drop their licensing
> fees. According to
> the article by Mark Pilgrim in Dive Into HTML5, it's something like $2500 -
> $10,000 to get a license
> to 'broadcast' if you're sending video to above 100K users.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Google's dropping H.264 from Chrome a step backward for openness
>> http://bit.ly/hqfoNx
>> 
>>> Prior to Google's decision, the migration from H.264-via-Flash to
>> H.264-via-<video> looked likely. Internet Explorer 9, Safari, and Chrome
>> were all to include native, built-in support for the codec, and even Firefox
>> users would be able to use H.264 video through Microsoft's plugin for that
>> browser. This would have represented great progress.
>> 
>> Source:
>> http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2011/01/googles-dropping-h264-from-chrome-a-step-backward-for-openness.ars/
>> See if people are clicking on this link:http://bit.ly/hqfoNx+
>> Try the bit.ly sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web:
>> http://bit.ly/pages/sidebar
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> [email protected]


Reply via email to