Ok, thanks, Tucker. Will do that!

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:00 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:

> As far as I know, only an administrator can edit the check in message. I've
> never tried.
>
> But that's why we update Jira with the change log. At least you can get one
> side of the cross-reference right. :)
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:33, Raju Bitter <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Tucker,
>
> I got an SVN question. I fixed a small piece for Opera/DHTML rotation, and
> calling svn-commit forgot to attach the correct change number (should have
> added raju-20110119-Gnt), and now committed a change with empty
> descpription. What should I do in such a case?
>
> Here's the console output:
>
>> ringo:trunk-opera-rotation raju$ svn-editchange raju-20110119-Gnt
>
> ringo:trunk-opera-rotation raju$ svn-commit
>
> Sending        WEB-INF/lps/lfc/kernel/dhtml/LzSprite.js
>
> Transmitting file data .
>
> Committed revision 18300.
>
> Log message from 'svn log -v -r18300' follows:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> r18300 | raju | 2011-01-20 16:28:41 +0100 (Thu, 20 Jan 2011) | 27 lines
>
> Changed paths:
>
>   M /openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/kernel/dhtml/LzSprite.js
>
>
>> Change raju-20110120-5N8 by [email protected] on 2011-01-20 15:41:05
>> CET
>
>    in /Users/raju/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk-opera-rotation
>
>    for <http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk>
>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>
>
>> Summary:
>
>
>> New Features:
>
>
>> Bugs Fixed:
>
>
>> Technical Reviewer: (pending)
>
> QA Reviewer: (pending)
>
> Doc Reviewer: (pending)
>
>
>> Documentation:
>
>
>> Release Notes:
>
>
>> Overview:
>
>
>
>
>> Details:
>
>
>
>
>> Tests:
>
>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>
>> Remember to update any Jira entries for bugs that are fixed by your
>
> change by pasting the log message just above into Jira as the comment when
>
> resolving the bug.  Also update the Fixed in Change# field with your
>
> revision number: 18300.
>
>
> Sorry for that.
>
> - Raju
>
>

Reply via email to