We had one customer who still was requiring swf9 about six months ago or so, but maybe that's no longer needed. It would be great to be able to drop support for it.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Raju Bitter < [email protected]> wrote: > Is SWF9 support still relevant? Looking at these numbers > > http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html > > it seems to be the case that Flash Player 10 is installed for 97% of > all users globally, but I don't know how real those numbers are. > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Raju Bitter > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Amy. > > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Amy Muntz <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks, Raju. I'll look into this in the morning. > >> -- Amy > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Raju Bitter > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Amy, you should probably add an swf10 entry to the component list in > >>> JIRA, since there will be features in the platform which are only > >>> supported in Flash Player 10 (swf9 is not sufficient). At the same > >>> time, you might want to add swf10. (for Flash Player 10.1). But maybe > >>> you use a different scheme for distinguishing features for the various > >>> Flash Player versions in the LFC. > >>> > >>> I ran into this when I tried to create an improvement request for text > >>> rotation in Flash Player 10 (without embedded fonts). > >> > >> > > > -- Henry Minsky Software Architect [email protected]
