I can't say for sure. For myself, when I need a 'namespace' I just use namespaces but replace the `:` or `.` of the namespace with a valid symbol character such as `_` or `$`.
E.g.: $lzc$class _dbg_name On 2011-02-26, at 15:35, Laszlo Developer wrote: > Thanks for the answer, I agree that namespaces are not necessarily a > good thing. How does the Webtop team structure the application and > make sure you don't pollute the global namespace? Especially, when 3rd > party modules are integrated into Webtop? > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:55 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: >> There has not been significant pressure to add namespaces to OpenLaszlo, >> although there is a Jira task to do so. If you have a need for namespaces, >> consider adding your comments to that task. >> >> Most likely OpenLaszlo will acquire namespaces by default when they are >> supported in the majority of ECMAScript platforms OpenLaszlo delivers to. >> >> Personally, I find most namespace schemes to be overly complex, resulting in >> a lot of boilerplate noise and overhead that make even the simplest program >> more difficult to comprehend. >> >> On 2011-02-26, at 11:53, Laszlo Developer wrote: >> >>> It seems that there is no namespace support in LZX. Is that something >>> which will be added in the near future? If not, what are the best >>> practices for using namespaces with 4.9 or the upcoming 5.0 release? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> L. >> >>
