Thanks, Tucker. That's definitely a good idea!
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:01 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> I never had much success in convincing "closed laszlo" to send their OL
> questions to the open lists. They really need to _always_ be encouraged to
> do so. If they don't, they are missing most of the OL developers!
>
> The "inside" OL developers can assist in this effort by:
>
> 1) When you get a question that is _not_ on the OL list, reply asking the
> questioner to post to the OL list, or
>
> 2) At the very least, cc your reply to the OL list.
>
> It's only a small effort, but it is crucial to both keeping the OL project
> alive _and_ getting the best answer to OL questions!
>
> On 2011-07-06, at 09:37, Raju Bitter wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately the trend continues: Just to give you an idea of the
>> activity in the past, and the rapid decline in 2010/2011:
>>
>> Average messages sent to the laszlo-dev mailing list per month:
>>
>> 2007 233 messages
>> 2008 525 messages
>> 2009 285 messages
>> 2010 Jan-Jun 125 messages
>> 2010 Jul-Dec 108 messages
>> 2011 Jan-Jun 54 messages
>>
>> If Laszlo continues to let OpenLaszlo decline with the current rate,
>> the project is dead by 2012 latest. The only hope is that someone
>> acquires Laszlo quickly. But who knows what new owner of the company
>> would do with OpenLaszlo...
>>
>> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Raju Bitter
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Great, thanks Amy. And enjoy the weekend!
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Amy Muntz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi Raju,
>>>>
>>>> We really are working on OpenLaszlo! There has been a lot of work going on
>>>> behind the scenes and you are right that we've become lax in always cc'ing
>>>> laszlo-dev as we should - especially when there is so much expertise out
>>>> there to help with issues. It's good to see that the forums are still very
>>>> active. For my part, I will be more vigilant about cc'ing laszlo-dev with
>>>> what's happening - starting now!
>>>>
>>>> It's a long holiday weekend here in the states, so expect things to improve
>>>> next week :)
>>>>
>>>> Amy
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Raju Bitter
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot, Don. That sounds interesting, rewrite of the event
>>>>> system! Tell me if I can help you, maybe doing some testing with that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Raju
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Donald Anderson <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Raju!
>>>>>> I'm here, working on (mostly) compiler and performance related issues,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> sometimes other things. I've needed to take some time away the last
>>>>>> week,
>>>>>> so I've been rather quiet. And I've been working on integrating Andre's
>>>>>> event system rewrite and that kept me pretty focused (and quiet).
>>>>>> - Don
>>>>>> On May 27, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Raju Bitter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 40-50% of emails for the past 8 weeks, to be correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Raju Bitter
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like the mailing list traffic is pretty much down for the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> past two weeks. Looking at the archives, I can see that 40-50% of the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mails sent to the list seem to be my own emails, and the activity is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> really down. The posting rate diagram shown here
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openlaszlo.devel proofs that the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> activity has never been that low since 2005/2006.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there still someone working on the OpenLaszlo platform at the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> moment? Just getting a bit concerned...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Don Anderson
>>>>>> Java/C/C++, Berkeley DB, systems consultant
>>>>>>
>>>>>> voice: 617-306-2057
>>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>>> www: http://www.ddanderson.com
>>>>>> blog: http://libdb.wordpress.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
