Okay correct would be for example (asuming that lzx.xsd is in the same folder like the test.lzx):
test.lzx: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <lzx:canvas xmlns:lzx="http://www.laszlosystems.com/2003/05/lzx"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.laszlosystems.com/2003/05/lzx lzx.xsd "> <lzx:view name="asddsa"> </lzx:view> </lzx:canvas> Question: Would it be an idea to make the compile in OpenLaszlo ignore the prefix of ANY tag ? Also to ignore other statements like schema or ":", currently it seems to be impossible to define a lzx file with valid schema, even if you simple use this template: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <canvas xmlns="http://www.laszlosystems.com/2003/05/lzx"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.laszlosystems.com/2003/05/lzx lzx.xsd "> </canvas> => Results in a exception: Compilation Errorstest.lzx:3:130: Syntax error: the token ":" was not expected at this position.test.lzx:3:126: found an unknown attribute named "schemaLocation" on element canvas, check the spelling of this attribute name The compile should accept those prefix and schema definitions, and just ignore them. That way you can use arbitrary prefix, which would make it more easy to combine for example a "project" or any kind of custom xsd with the global xsd. Making the same with a DTD is a lot more difficult as you need to manually write a task that combines the DTD into a single file. Also namespaces seem to be more up-to-date in features to handle complex schemas. Further: The xsd the current build process produces is not correct: It ignores the possibility to define attribute values in inherited classes, example: <class name="blabla" extends="view" width="200"> </class> => is invalid. I guess this is something we could live with, you need to define such attributes in the instance: <blabla width="200" /> => would be okay again. However this should be clearly written down in the docs. Sebastian 2011/11/23 [email protected] <[email protected]> > Starting from my DTD question it seems like another question would be how > to correctly define XMLNS definitions for a XML file. > > Is there an example file that uses the current .xsd ? > > XMLNS is somehow more flexible as DTDs are. > But can openlaszlo handle that? > > for example prefixes for xml tags? How does the laszlo-compiler handle for > example: > > <xi:myCustomView> > > ? > > Does the compile ignore the xi tag or does it anything with it? > > Sebastian > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > http://www.openmeetings.de > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] > -- Sebastian Wagner http://www.openmeetings.de http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
