I realized I could do this by using the existing test the first pass through the loop.
P T Withington wrote: > Don't you want to first check that the view you start with contains the > point, before you start walking the parents? That would seem more optimal. > > On 2009-09-03, at 15:31, Max Carlson wrote: > >> Change 20090901-maxcarlson-b by maxcarl...@bank on 2009-09-01 17:42:31 >> PDT >> in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean >> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk >> >> Summary: Fix LzView.containsPt() to handle clipped and invisible items >> >> Bugs Fixed: LPP-8379 - mousetrack events act as if clip attribute >> would not exist >> >> Technical Reviewer: ptw >> QA Reviewer: [email protected] >> >> Details: LzTrack - Use LzView.containsPt() to determine if items >> should be tracked. >> >> LaszloView - Update containsPt() to check for invisible and masked >> parents' bounds. >> >> Tests: See LPP-8379. >> >> Files: >> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/services/LzTrack.lzs >> M WEB-INF/lps/lfc/views/LaszloView.lzs >> >> Changeset: >> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20090901-maxcarlson-b.tar >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-reviews mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-reviews mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews
