very good questions... hmm. I'll check and see why the compiler is running at all.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:04 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]>wrote: > Not approved yet: > > What is the 'deploy' version of properties supposed to do? > > Should it really be a separately maintained list, or should it be generated > by the build? Or, maybe it is totally stale and should just go away, since > we don't recommend using the LPS server for deployment? > > While this change fixes the immediate bug the user filed about (null > pointer), it doesn't solve the larger bug: apparently they were expecting > that by using the deploy version of properties nothing would ever be > compiled, so why was his stuff being compiled in the first place? > > > > On 2009-10-14, at 13:20, Henry Minsky wrote: > > Change 20091014-hqm-T by [email protected] on 2009-10-14 13:18:01 EDT >> in /Users/hqm/openlaszlo/trunk6 >> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk >> >> Summary: update the 'deploy' version of lps.properties >> >> New Features: >> >> Bugs Fixed: LPP-7705 >> >> Technical Reviewer: ptw >> QA Reviewer: (pending) >> Doc Reviewer: (pending) >> >> Documentation: >> >> Release Notes: >> >> Details: >> >> + default compiler.runtime.dir in LPS.java >> >> + merge over some of the newer lps.properties >> >> Tests: >> >> Files: >> M WEB-INF/lps/config-deploy/lps.properties >> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/server/LPS.java >> >> Changeset: >> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20091014-hqm-T.tar >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-reviews mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews >> > > -- Henry Minsky Software Architect [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Laszlo-reviews mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews
