Thanks. Seems like we are ready for some real webtop QA cycles against a .lzo build then.
On 2009-12-10, at 18:39, Max Carlson wrote: > Approved! This makes the debug output match between LZO and non, provided I > add > > <include href="../components/attributewatcher" /> > > to Webtop.lzx. > > On 12/10/09 12:11 PM, P T Withington wrote: >> Change 20091210-ptw-Q by [email protected] on 2009-12-10 12:20:58 EST >> in /Users/ptw/OpenLaszlo/trunk >> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk >> >> Summary: Reinstate `tagname`, don't warn in dependencies methods >> >> Bugs Fixed: LPP-7184 Binary libraries don't work in swf9 >> >> Technical Reviewer: max (pending) >> QA Reviewer: mdemmon (pending) >> >> Details: >> >> NodeModel: When binary-compiling a dependency function we have to >> insert a #pragma to turn off undefined warnings (for >> back-compatibility with swf8). >> >> ClassModel: Always emit published tags. Serializers expect to be >> able to translate from instance back to tag with >> `this.constructor.tagname`. Move the descriptive debug >> information for anonymous classes to a debug slot so tagname is >> not polluted. >> >> Tests: >> Smokecheck. Inspection of generated .lzo's >> >> Files: >> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/NodeModel.java >> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/ClassModel.java >> >> Changeset: http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20091210-ptw-Q.tar > > -- > Regards, > Max Carlson > OpenLaszlo.org _______________________________________________ Laszlo-reviews mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews
