I thought it was just to make sure that inside of a drawview that the background is behind any other artwork.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:51 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]>wrote: > Henry has already approved this, but I'm curious: > > I thought the LZX model was that views get stacked in the (lexical) order > they are declared. This change would seem to make it so that a drawview > will always be under any sibling views. Is that the intent, or do I not > understand what is really going on here? > > On 2010-01-25, at 19:57, Max Carlson wrote: > > > Change 20100125-maxcarlson-n by maxcarl...@bank on 2010-01-25 16:55:04 > PST > > in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean > > for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk > > > > Summary: swf9/10: Ensure drawview's container doesn't overlap child > sprites > > > > Bugs Fixed: LPP-8731 - Background obscures foreground > > > > Technical Reviewer: hminsky > > QA Reviewer: ptw > > > > Details: Use addChildAt() when creating the drawview container sprite, to > ensure it's placed behind any other children. > > > > Tests: See LPP-8731 > > > > Files: > > M lps/components/extensions/drawview.lzx > > > > Changeset: > http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100125-maxcarlson-n.tar > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Laszlo-reviews mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews > > -- Henry Minsky Software Architect [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Laszlo-reviews mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews
