approved

note: this code runs properly

      [1,2].forEach(function(a:*) {Debug.write(a)});

But if I add a 'void' return type declaration for the anon function, it gets
an error
at runtime

      [1,2].forEach(function(a:*) : void {Debug.write(a)});


ERROR @hello.lzx≈4: ArgumentError: Error #1063: Argument count mismatch on
<anonymous>(). Expected 1, got 3.



On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:24 PM, André Bargull <[email protected]>wrote:

> Change 20100501-bargull-k2W by barg...@bargull02 on 2010-05-01 00:42:11
> in /home/anba/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>
> Summary: fix for flex array literal vs. meta data bug
>
> New Features:
>
> Bugs Fixed: LPP-8891 (SWF9: don't remove parenthesis around brackets or add
> them automatically)
>
> Technical Reviewer: ptw
> QA Reviewer: henry
> Doc Reviewer: (pending)
>
> Documentation:
>
> Release Notes:
>
> Overview:
>
>
> Details:
> The ActionScript3 grammar does not follow the ECMAScript grammar for
> MemberExpressions, namely the MemberExpression for property access must not
> be an ArrayLiteral, cf. section 11.2 "Left-Hand-Side Expressions" ECMAScript
> 3rd/5th edition. This restriction was added to ActionScript3 due to their
> MetaData support, e.g. [Embed(source="...")].
> This change adds the required parenthesis around array literals for
> property access.
>
>
> Tests:
> [].forEach(function(...rest){}) works in swf9+
>
> Files:
> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/SWF9ParseTreePrinter.java
>
> Changeset:
> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100501-bargull-k2W.tar
>
>


-- 
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[email protected]

Reply via email to