> > Is there documentation on what "text" and "html" types are supposed to mean? > (My intuition is that "text" should mean "interpreted as CDATA" and "html" > should mean "interpreted as node 'content'". I.e., < and & don't have any > special meaning in the former, but they do in the latter. >
We had the concept of elements which were allowed to contain HTML tags in their text vs ones which weren't, but I don't remember what the compiler was supposed to do about enforcing that. Maybe it was supposed to warn if you had HTML elements in a content that was declared as "text" rather than "html"?
