Ok.  No sense in adding them then, as clearly we don't have anything to lose.

On 2010-08-05, at 11:30, Lou Iorio wrote:

> Beyond the question of the usefulness of an index in an online document
> (in my mind not very), implementing an index at this point would be an
> enormous amount of work (a good index always is).
> 
> I was not there when the doc was designed, but I suspect that the index tags
> that are there now were machine generated when the doc was moved from
> HTML to DocBook. No index tags have been added for at least the past
> few years.
> 
> I certainly agree with your point in general.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:52 AM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I have just one question, (from something I learned when programming
>> robots:  It is much easier to remember where you left something than to go
>> looking for it again):  Should we use the "right" markup in hopes there will
>> someday be an index, rather than having to go look for indexable terms when
>> that day arrives?
>> 
>> On 2010-08-05, at 10:18, Lou Iorio wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm afraid the markup is wildly different throughout the doc. When I add
>>> anything
>>> new, I just use the <literal> tag: I've stopped using the <sgmltag> as
>> well.
>>> 
>>> Tags like <indexterm> and <sgmltag> were part of the original design, but
>>> never implemented.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM, André Bargull <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hmm, I've just copied and pasted the docbook markup from other places in
>>>> the same chapter, that's why there are the additional <indexterm> tags.
>>>> 
>>>> I've made the following changes per your review comments and committed
>> the
>>>> change:
>>>> - removed all <indexterm>, but left <sgmltag> in the initial paragraph
>>>> (that way the attributes are rendered in the same font just like in the
>> rest
>>>> of the chapter)
>>>> - applied your proposal and simplified the list items, so the attribute
>>>> name is not repeated twice
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 8/5/2010 2:26 PM, Lou Iorio wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> approved, but I'm not sure why you're using docbook "indexterm" tags:
>>>>> 
>>>>> since we don't have an index, and probably never will. I just use
>>>>> "literal" tags
>>>>> for this kind of thing. It's really only a display issue: indexterms
>>>>> appear in the
>>>>> HTML as red text.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would simplify this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> <literal>textalign</literal>:
>>>>> <indexterm><primary>textalign</primary></indexterm><sgmltag
>>>>> class="attribute">textalign</sgmltag> specifies
>>>>>         how to align the text...
>>>>> 
>>>>> to this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> <literal>textalign</literal>: specifies
>>>>>         how to align the text...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Of course, you may know something I don't.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lou
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:13 PM, André Bargull <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Change 20100805-bargull-XZZ by barg...@bargull02 on 2010-08-05
>>>>>  01:43:22
>>>>>  in /home/anba/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
>>>>>  for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Summary: add "letterspacing", "textalign", "textdecoration" and
>>>>>  "textindent" to the text chapter of the Developer's Guide
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Bugs Fixed: LPP-8123 (lz.text - reference: improve description of
>>>>>  "letterspacing", "textalign", "textdecoration" and "textindent")
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Doc Reviewer: lou
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Documentation:
>>>>>  Added documentation for "letterspacing", "textalign",
>>>>>  "textdecoration" and "textindent" with a simple example to show all
>>>>>  attributes in action.
>>>>>  And some other clean-up for the text chapter, see details section
>>>>> below.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Details:
>>>>>  - simple inline programlistings are no longer spanned over multiple
>>>>>  lines
>>>>>  - setXScroll() and setYScroll are deprecated, changed references to
>>>>>  use xscroll resp. yscroll attribute
>>>>>  - changed "scrollHeight" to proper lower case spelling "scrollheight"
>>>>>  - removed a couple of notes about resize behaviour of text, they
>>>>>  were totally out-dated
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Tests:
>>>>>  build dguide, visual verify
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Files:
>>>>>  M docs/src/developers/text.dbk
>>>>>  A docs/src/developers/programs/text.advanced-styles.lzx
>>>>> 
>>>>>  Changeset:
>>>>> 
>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100805-bargull-XZZ.tar
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Reply via email to