Huzzah.  We have a nightly build too, for the first time in 4 days.  I filed a 
separate bug for André's comment.  I suppose there should be a bug to figure 
out why doc-comments behave so non-intuitively.

On 2010-10-30, at 14:48, Henry Minsky wrote:

> "ant doc" doc build completes for me, approved
> 
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Change ptw-20101030-HBr by [email protected] on 2010-10-30 12:33:09 EDT
>>   in /Users/ptw/OpenLaszlo/trunk-3
>>   for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>> 
>> Summary: Try #2 to fix the build
>> 
>> Bugs Fixed:  LPP-9475 4.7-based tree fails to compile in 4.9 with no useful
>> error message
>> 
>> Technical Reviewer: [email protected] (pending)
>> QA Reviewer: antun (pending)
>> 
>> Details:
>>   It turns out it is not the <include> that causes the doc to fail
>>   to generate.  It is the doc comment inside the <library> tag.  For
>>   some reason, when the doc generator sees a doc comment, it only
>>   processes the next xml tag after that and ignores everything
>>   else.  Moving the doc comment outside the library lets me put
>>   everything back to the way it should be (include dependency
>>   directly in the library, autoincludes.properties not hand-edited,
>>   no kludge dataselectioninclude file).
>> 
>> Tests:
>>   local doc build, kicking off another nightly
>> 
>> Files:
>> M       WEB-INF/lps/misc/lzx-autoincludes.properties
>> D       lps/components/utils/dataselectioninclude.lzx
>> M       lps/components/utils/dataselectionmanager.lzx
>> 
>> Changeset:
>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/ptw-20101030-HBr.tar
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Henry Minsky
> Software Architect
> [email protected]


Reply via email to