Approved!

On 2011-03-27, at 12:07, André Bargull wrote:

> Change bargull-20110327-rCm by bargull@Bargull02 on 2011-03-27 17:45:28
> in /home/anba/src/svn/openlaszlo/trunk
> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
> 
> Summary: Replace StringWriter with StringBuilder in ScriptCompiler
> 
> Bugs Fixed: LPP-9736 (Clean up java sources) (partial)
> 
> Technical Reviewer: ptw
> QA Reviewer: (pending)
> 
> Details:
> StringWriter uses StringBuffer internally, StringBuffer is synchronized for 
> use in multiple threads. Java5's new StringBuilder provides the same 
> functionality as StringBuffer, but safes the synchronization overhead. That 
> means StringBuilder should be preferred over StringBuffer/StringWriter.
> 
> ScriptCompiler:
> #writeObject(Object, Appendable)
> -- changed second parameter from Writer to Java5 Appendable
> -- this allows to use Writers as well as faster alternatives, e.g. 
> StringBuilder (Writer implements Appendable)
> #isIdentifier(String)
> -- use hashset instead of slower string comparison
> #quote(String), #JSONquote(String)
> -- code was almost the same, except for quote character selection in quote() 
> and slash character escaping in JSONquote()
> -- quoteInternal() is now used for quoting, quote() and JSONquote() use this 
> new method internally
> #quoteInternal(String, char, boolean)
> -- new method for quoting, works for Javascript- and JSON-quoting
> -- uses StringBuilder instead of StringReader+StringWriter
> 
> CanvasCompiler, DebugCompiler, NodeModel, StyleSheetCompiler:
> - use StringBuilder instead of StringWriter
> 
> Tests:
> 
> Files:
> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/ScriptCompiler.java
> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/CanvasCompiler.java
> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/NodeModel.java
> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/DebugCompiler.java
> M WEB-INF/lps/server/src/org/openlaszlo/compiler/StyleSheetCompiler.java
> 
> Changeset: 
> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/bargull-20110327-rCm.tar
> 


Reply via email to