Should we base our wrapper on flashobject?  It would be nice to share the maintenance of this piece of the system with other developers.

flashobject is distributed under the MIT license, so there are no legal obstacles to this.

On Dec 7, 2005, at 3:37 PM, DL wrote:

On 7 Dec 2005 at 14:09, Ronen Mizrahi wrote:

> As long as we are on the subject, I think the SOLO deploy function has a
> small bug. The genrated HTML wrapper includes a call to lzHistEmbed()
> with something like 'lps-3.1' as argument (I do not have it in front of
> me so the argument can be slightly different but you get the idea). This
> makes no sense when doing SOLO deployment and moreover unless I change
> it to the empty string calls to lzSetCanvasAttribute seem to do nothing.
> Am I missing something here?

If deploying apps in SOLO mode .. you can try using flashobject.js in the HTML wrapper page instead of embed.js ..


Now flashobject.js does not have the lzSetCanvasAttribute() and lzHistEmbed() functions built in, as in openlaszlo embed.js .. but you can add these _javascript_ functions yourself (if needed) to be compatible with openlaszlo ..

On the other hand, Flashvars and other parameters are quite easily added in flashobject.js syntax.   And there is alternative text <div> container which displays if flash plugin needs to be installed ..

DL
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-user mailing list

_______________________________________________
Laszlo-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user

Reply via email to