Papadogiannakis,PT thanks for your reply. Papadogiannakis, I thought whether I complied. But there is any cooler way of writing, i think.
P T Withington wrote: > On 9 Dec 2005, at 03:50, Papadogiannakis Vagelis wrote: > >> mt1 wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> When i need two event, i always write it as following. >>> >>> <some tag onclick="methodName()" onkeydown="methodName()"> >>> <method name="methodName"> >>> some code >>> </method> >>> </some tag> >>> >>> Is there a better method ? >> > > I'm not aware of one. I think it is unusual to have a single handler > for different events, so there is no shortcut. > >> i dont really know if it is better, but I am sure there is an >> alternative, which is better in terms of code readabillity >> >> <sometag> >> <method event="onclick"> >> some code >> </method> >> <method event="onkeydown"> >> some other code >> </method> >> </sometag> > > > Note that there is an [enhancment proposal](http:// > wiki.openlaszlo.org/Enhancement_Proposals) [EP 219](http:// > wiki.openlaszlo.org/Event_and_handler_tags) to change the syntax of > events and handlers. Under that proposal, you would write: > > <sometag> > <handler name="onclick"> > some code > </handler> > <handler name="onkeydown"> > some other code > </handler> > </sometag> > > Comments on that proposal are welcome. > > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
