Thanks all Jim Grandy wrote:
> Interesting! I didn't know about the special status of "new:". Is this > usage documented? It isn't mentioned in Chapter 33 except by use in > the example. > > But I do think it no longer works, or perhaps it doesn't work the way > it would need to in the example -- where a "contact" node would have > to be automatically created within the dataset for the entry fields to > be visible. > > Now that we have local datasets, do we need this notation anymore? > > jim > > ps I've added your comment to the bug (LPP-1284). > > On Jan 3, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Adam Wolff wrote: > >> yes, the xpath expression new:/ is special. It's supposed to create an >> anonymous local dataset, although I don't know how well that >> functionality >> has been maintained (i.e. there may be bugs with it now.) The proper way >> to create an anonymous localdataset is to use the tag that's new in 3.1. >> >> A >> >> On Jan 3, mt1 wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> In the user's guide example 33.23, if i use the other datapath name, >>> something like >>> "aa:/contact", instead of "new:/contact", the debugger shows "couldn't >>> find dataset >>> for aa:/contact". Dose the "new:/" datapath special key word? >>> >>> Thanks >>> m1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Laszlo-user mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user > > > > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
