Wouldn't it make more sense to use checkboxes rather than comboboxes if the user is choosing between Yes & No?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, William Krick wrote: > My app has a lot of Yes/No comboboxes. > > Would there be any benefit to making them all datacomboboxes and pointing > them all at the same dataset containing two items, "yes" and "no"? > > Does changing the selection in one datacombobox, navigate all datacomboboxes > linked to the same dataset? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Grandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 6:48 PM > To: William Krick > Cc: Laszlo-User > Subject: Re: [Laszlo-user] combo box bloat == 100 meg laszlo app > > > datacombobox *is* newcombobox, just under a different name. The > correspondence is: > > incubator/newcombobox becomes base/basedatacombobox > incubator/lzcomombobox becomes lz/datacombobox > > The main cause of bloat and slow initialization with combobox is that > it creates a floatinglist instance when it is initialized. So all of > the comboboxes in your application will have an associated > floatinglist instance. > > We improved that in newcombobox to share a floatinglist between all > newcombobox instances using the same style. But this created bugs > with data binding and synchronization, so with datacombobox we > changed it so that each instance has its own floatinglist, but the > floatinglist is only instantiated when needed. > > This is still a bit fragile because newcombobox/datacombobox is > engineered to get its selection manager and data state from the > floatinglist -- selection and value have to be managed manually until > the floatinglist is created. There are improvements to be made there. > > Note that both newcombobox and datacombobox are entirely data-driven > (hence the name of the latter), so you can't supply the menu items > statically as you can with combobox. > > jim > > > On Mar 23, 2006, at 1:26 PM, William Krick wrote: > > > I'm working on an OpenLaszlo application that has a lot of controls > > for data > > input. > > > > When I load our app up in a browser and check the memory use for that > > browser instance in task manager, it's around 100 megs. > > > > Obviously this is WAY too large and something has to be done to > > bring the > > size down. > > > > After some digging, it appears that the majority of our apps memory > > use is > > due to combo boxes. LOTS of comboboxes. > > > > The combobox is critical to our application so we need a solution that > > brings the memory use for comboboxes way down. > > > > Also, a side effect of this bloat is that anything that dynamically > > manipulates the contents of a combobox like adding or removing > > items, or > > refreshing the list when connected to a dataset, is unusably slow > > in our > > application. > > > > I know there was some work done on a "newcombobox" but it appears > > that that > > might have been abandoned in favor of the "datacombobox" which doesn't > > really address the bloat problem. > > > > Can anyone tell me what, if anything, can be done to remedy our > > situation? > > > > My co-worker is putting together and will post an example that > > specifically > > addresses the performance problems when manipulating comboboxes but > > I just > > wanted to query the list about a solution to the larger problem of > > application bloat due to comboboxes. > > > > Is it possible to strip down the combobox and/or textlistitem to > > make them > > less memory hungry? > > > > ... > > Krick > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Laszlo-user mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
