from my back-end app:
if i call request.getParameter("lzpostbody") i have null data!!!!
if i call
...
while ( ( s = reader.readLine()) != null ) {
write s;
}
...
where BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(request.getInputStream()));
s writes <ds><foo><bar id="25030"/></foo></ds>
is it correct having data in the request body instead parameter?
Luca
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Henry Minsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: mar 28/03/2006 16.21
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: James Howe; [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: R: [Laszlo-user] Change in the way lzpostbody works in 3.2?
Can you send me a zip file or attachment which contains the exact XML data
your back-end app is returning?
On 3/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> but why when i run the application below i have this messages
> ERROR: data conversion error for
> http://10.172.69.155:8080/my-laszlo-webapp/command?lzpostbody=%CdsNAN.000000%CfooNAN.000000%Cbar
> NaNdNAN%22NAN.000000NAN.000000%CNAN.000000fooNAN.000000%CNAN.000000dsNAN.000000:
> Parsing XML: only whitespace content allowed before start tag and not n
> (position: START_DOCUMENT seen n... @1:1)
>
>
> ???
>
> seems use GET instead POST
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] per conto di James Howe
> Inviato: mar 28/03/2006 0.00
> A: Henry Minsky
> Cc: [email protected]
> Oggetto: Re: [Laszlo-user] Change in the way lzpostbody works in 3.2?
>
> My application is running in proxied mode.
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:35:20 -0500, Henry Minsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I've seen a couple of reports about the lzpostbody behavior and the
> > 3.2release. I am looking at it now. Note that lzpostbody is only
> > supported for proxied data requests, it is not supported for SOLO data
> > requests at this
> > time (this was true in previous releases also, it's not a regression).
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/27/06, James Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to get my application to work under 3.2 and I've run into a
> >> problem with submitting information to my back end server via POST.
> >> Take
> >> this program, for example:
> >>
> >> <canvas debug="true">
> >> <dataset name="ds">
> >> <foo><bar id="25030"/></foo>
> >> </dataset>
> >> <dataset name="updater" type="http"/>
> >> <view>
> >> <button Me
> >> <method name="doit">
> >> var pointer = ds.getPointer();
> >> updater.setSrc("
> http://localhost/test/foo
> >> ");
> >> updater.setHeader("Content-Type",
> >> "application/xml");
> >> updater.setQueryType("POST");
> >> updater.setQueryParam("lzpostbody",
> >> pointer.serialize());
> >> updater.doRequest();
> >> </method>
> >> </button>
> >> </view>
> >> </canvas>
> >>
> >> I have a simple servlet which writes information to a log file based on
> >> the information contained in the request. When I run this program
> under
> >> 3.1.1, I get my XML content as the content of the request (I ask the
> >> request for the content length and then get an input stream on the
> >> request
> >> and read the content). Under 3.1.1, the content information is this:
> >>
> >> Content-Type: application/xml
> >> Content-Length: 41
> >> Content: <ds><foo><bar>Some Stuff</bar></foo></ds>
> >>
> >> However, when I run the same application under 3.2, the content is not
> >> retrievable via the input stream for the request, instead, the content
> >> is
> >> contained as a parameter value. My servlet produces the following
> >> information for the content:
> >>
> >> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8
> >> Content-Length: 37
> >> Content:
> >>
> >> Something obviously changed. If 3.2 has some improvement which
> >> corrects a
> >> defect in 3.1.1, I'm happy to make code changes to work with the new
> way
> >> of doing things. I've already had to do that with namespaces.
> >> Basically
> >> what I need to be able to do is execute a POST operation with arbitrary
> >> XML as the posted value. I'm not posting a form, I'm using a
> REST-style
> >> interaction where I want to POST some XML which is used to update a
> >> resource identified by the URL.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> --
> >> James Howe
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Laszlo-user mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Henry Minsky
> > Software Architect
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> James Howe
> _______________________________________________
> Laszlo-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
>
>
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Laszlo-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-user
