Thank you Tucker. I can see a lot of 'private' parameter in sample codes at ML and Forum. I think it is not good. We will be careful from now on. ：＾）
mt1 P T Withington wrote: > Exactly as you say. Names that start with `_` are private by > convention and may be changed without notice. This is only a > convention, and is not currently enforced by the compiler, so you can > access those names, but you do so at your own risk. Private names may > be enforced in the future for efficiency, but they cannot be relied on > for security. > > On 2007-06-13, at 22:36 EDT, mt1 wrote: > >> Hi forks, >> >> I have thinking, it is good to use private parameters in a LZX >> application. >> I mean they are the name of parameters, such like '_**' . >> >> Because they are undocumented code, and i think it would be hard to >> understand for >> new comer to use them in a application. And also, there will not >> announcement if they will >> be deprecated. >> >> I understand you can create a application to use them but in the >> maintenance stage of it, >> we come up against to chase it so hard. >> >> What do you think of it and are there any good way to use private >> parameters ? >> >> >> Thank you. >> mt1 >> > > >
