My problem is with ie6 because it's so slow it's not a good experience for users of dhtml sites. Gmail can cope with it though. Anyways I'm planning to publish flash for ie6 users, and that's when multiple runtimes will be usefull, I wish I didn't have to but ie6 sucks bigtime. And a lot of people, companies, schools won't upgrade to 7 in a year or so is my guess. Currently I have a nice test setup. Ubuntu: opera, mozilla, firefox, konqueror, and with VMWare I got: Safari 3, ie6(used multiple-ies to install) , ie7 and win firefox. Sometimes graphics look a little different on windows firefox than linux one... cheers, Can
On 6/17/07, P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-06-16, at 09:40 EDT, Henry Minsky wrote: > I believe IE6 is the slowest runtime. In order of speed of > execution of > javascript, I think we have > > IE6 slowest > Flash 7/8 > IE7 pretty fast > Firefox 2 fastest You left out Safari 3 faster still. :)
