Any word on this?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Greg Denton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are some of the things I've tried. Note all the different effects
> for what appears to be equivalent code.
>
> <canvas>
> <script>
>
> System.security.loadPolicyFile("https://rest.mydomain.com/crossdomain.xml";);
> </script>
> <!-- NOTE: src is needed in order to get nsprefix to work -->
> <dataset name="dssend" proxied="false" nsprefix="true" src="https:"/>
> <node name="datactl">
> <method name="send">
> var ds = dssend;
> var x = '<![CDATA[<foo>bar</foo>]]>';
>
> ds.setAttribute('src', 'https://rest.mydomain.com/foos');
> ds.setQueryParams(null); // clear query params
> ds.setAttribute('querytype', 'POST');
>
> // Sends "sid=abcdefg" as body, very odd. x is NOT sent.
> // ds.setQueryParam('sid', 'abcdefg');
> // ds.setPostBody(x);
>
> // Sends encoded x, odd again.
> // BUT if the above ds.setQueryParams(null) is
> // removed it is sent as is (i.e. correctly).
> // ds.setPostBody(x);
>
> // Sends correct x (even with ds.setQueryParams(null)).
> // ds.setQueryParam('lzpostbody', x);
>
> // Sends correct x, but no sid in query params.
> ds.setQueryParam('sid', 'abcdefg');
> ds.setQueryParam('lzpostbody', x);
>
> ds.doRequest();
> </method>
> </node>
> <button text="Send">
> <handler name="onclick" args="v">datactl.send();</handler>
> </button>
> </canvas>
>
> Running:
> laszlo 4.2.b2, compiled for swf8
> Firefox 2.0.0.16 on CentOS 5.0 (2.6.18-53.el5) x86_64
> Flash player LNX 9,0,124,0
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Henry Minsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Greg Denton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I just want to touch base on the SLOLO REST support for 4.2. This may
>>> be more of a swf question but if anyone could comment, it would be
>>> appreciated. (We are getting closer to a release and need to know
>>> whether/how to hack our backend service to do workarounds. I almost
>>> had a workaround for current 4.2b2 swf8 code but then discovered that
>>> query params could not be set when a body is given, argh!)
>>
>>
>> Are you sure that query params cannot be set when there is a post
>> body? I could have sworn
>> we specifically fixed that to work. Can you send me a test case?
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Review of a completely transparent REST/HTTP interface:
>>>
>>> 1. All methods supported, PUT/DELETE in addition to GET/POST.
>>> 2. For all method types, independently set:
>>> (a) request headers,
>>> (b) query params,
>>> (c) body/content.
>>> 3. For all responses (all method types), whether status OK or not, get:
>>> (a) status,
>>> (b) response headers,
>>> (c) body/content (parse returned XML).
>>>
>>> (The odd thing is that this is the basic HTTP protocol and, in some
>>> ways, is simpler to implement than constraining things as is currently
>>> done.)
>>>
>>> I presume that this would only be available on swf9/DHTML, right?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Greg Denton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for the update and all the good work. My brief testing with
>>>> 4.2alpha didn't go so well, I'll wait for the beta to be more
>>>> thorough.
>>>>
>>>> Openlaszlo has such a good fundamental design for rapid application
>>>> development that to hobble easily programmable communication with
>>>> backend services over such a simple, open standard would be a loss.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Henry Minsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> A matrix is a good idea!
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is my understanding of what should work for SOLO http operations
>>>>>
>>>>> SWF8 SWF9 DHTML
>>>>> GET X X X
>>>>> POST X* X X
>>>>> PUT X X
>>>>> DELETE X X
>>>>>
>>>>> * in swf8, you can set the postbody to be a valid XML document, and that
>>>>> content
>>>>> will be posted verbatim. If you make something which is not valid XML, it
>>>>> will be posted
>>>>> as a string which is XML-escaped.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you see different behavior, please post a note to me or file a bug
>>>>> report
>>>>> with the details.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Greg Denton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Can anyone summarize the SOLO REST support that is (alpha)/will be
>>>>>> (release) working in 4.2? A matrix would be nice :-). In the wiki even
>>>>>> nicer so we wouldn't have to search so much.
>>>>>> http://wiki.openlaszlo.org/Laszlo_on_REST looks like only proposals,
>>>>>> need to track current status.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> swf8, swf9, dhtml
>>>>>> POST
>>>>>> PUT
>>>>>> DELETE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> request set headers?
>>>>>> response get headers, status code?
>>>>>> cross-domain issues?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume no problems with GET (other than maybe confusion with
>>>>>> setQueryParams, LPP-6586).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> POST body looks like it Is fixed in 4.2beta:
>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-6683
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Might want to close this (or mark duplicate?):
>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-2195
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pretty good overview of past problems (close and/or add comment, link to
>>>>>> wiki?):
>>>>>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-1045
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Henry Minsky
>>>>> Software Architect
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Minsky
>> Software Architect
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
