Hang on just a sec.
Yes, the LFC is written this way. And yes we use an intermediate
language that is based on Javascript 2. But by no means to we claim
to support Javascript 2 (especially since it is not even a standard
yet).
It would be interesting to know what this developer's application is,
because each time we have _thought_ we needed to do this (e.g., for
the initial drawview component) we have ended up realizing that the
problem really was missing functionality in LZX, which, once that was
added, allowed us to write the component in LZX.
On 2009-02-09, at 21:35EST, Max Carlson wrote:
It's definitely something we support. The LFC is written this way...
Antun Karlovac wrote:
Hi all,
I got a question from a developer about using JavaScript class
syntax (i.e. class MyClass extends SomeLFCClass {}) with LZX.
Is that something that we now support in addition to the LZX class
construct? Or should we be steering the community away from it?
Thanks,
Antun
--
Regards,
Max Carlson
OpenLaszlo.org
