On 2009-11-13, at 08:04, Rami Ojares / AMG Oy wrote: > I have been wondering... > > Can I say LzTimer and lz.Timer > or > LzDelegate and lz.Delegate > > These conventions seem to be mixed and matched in docs. > What is the difference here?
This is a good question that probably applies to many people. I hope you don't mind that I copied my reply to laszlo-user. We are trying to move away from having many global definitions, so OpenLaszlo can work better with other Javascript libraries and frameworks. So the "modern" way is to use lz.Timer. We provide LzTimer for backward compatibility, but will remove it eventually. The goal is to, as much as possible, have all OpenLaszlo globals defined in the `lz` "namespace". We regret that the documentation still refers in some places to LzTimer, etc. We have not had any documentation resources for a while.
