Heh. Remember, OL want to deliver to multiple runtimes, and DHTML is one of those, so it should get at least 1/3 (if not 1/2 as swf8 fades) of our attention.
I think it is a red herring to talk about webkit and iphone as if they were different from any other standards-compliant browser. Our runtime strives to follow the evolving standards (with quirks where necessary to support /de facto/ standards imposed by market share). Flash/as3 also get at least 1/3 of our attention. It is a powerful and ubiquitous runtime that on the whole has far fewer quirks to deal with. So, we really have to do both. On 2010-03-27, at 07:15, Rami Ojares wrote: > Someday it's the html5 and webkit > The other day it's touchscreen and iPhone > > How about making laszlo work well on a standard desktop system > with proper keyboard and mouse attached and the newest flash player installed? > > (Yeah I know. I am a conservative. Some might even call me a monarchist :-) > My only defence is that I am right ;-) > > - rami > > > On 27.3.2010 2:36, [email protected] wrote: >> I believe UI (or UX ...User eXperience... as is apparently the fancy new >> acronym?) is in the early stages of transitioning heavily towards >> "multi-touch" type interfaces, the iPhone being the first widely-accepted >> and well-implemented example. A number of mainstream vendors like Dell and >> HP are now offering very affordable full "multi-touch" touch-screen LCD >> monitors and integrated all-in-one PC's. It is headed that way, no doubt >> in my mind. >> >> So, you bet, it seems very wise to begin thinking down these paths in terms >> of OL's functionality. > >
