Thank you! Just for your post http://www.kamijs.com/blog/archive/2010/07/creating-an-opera-widget-out-of-an-openlaszlo-application#comment-165 I will study is now.. I mean if you have an OL APP and then use the OP widget emulator, why does it not set these settings by itself or prompt me?!
I get back to the list after I have read fully your above post.. -- Sent from Ubuntu Raju Bitter wrote: > The Opera widget runtime for Desktop implements security features > which are in place for mobile devices, but are needed for desktop as > well: > http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/the-opera-widgets-runtime-for-desktop/ > > http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/presto24/widgets/#sec > > > > You probably don't want a widget to send files from your file system > to remote servers, or to modify files on your filesystem without > permissions. That means, there is a security sandbox integrated into > the runtime. > > > Opera supports the default Widgets security model. The > following points are a summary of the Opera default security > model for Widgets. > 1. Opera silently denies direct access to resources residing > on a user's file system. > 2. Opera allows a Widget to access content over the Widget > protocol. > 3. Opera denies access to the end-user's file system over the > file: URI scheme. > 4. In the presence of a protocol element, Opera grants a > Widget access to protocols that it supports through the > appropriate URI scheme (e.g., ftp, etc.). In the absence of > protocol elements, Opera allows a Widget to access content > over the http and https protocols. > 5. Opera allows communication over default ports, or only to > the ports the author has pre-declared as ports using the port > element. Opera, however, denies Widgets from using ports equal > to or below 1023 that are not default ports, even if access is > requested by the author via the port element. > > > - Raju > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Founder <[email protected]> wrote: > > THX 4 your help! I will look at the links later. > > Best, > Duke2010 > > PS: when I want to deploy dthml as a Desktop widget I see no > link to mobile devices ;) > > > -- > Sent from Ubuntu > > > > > > > Raju Bitter wrote: > > > Check the list of standards and other links on this > > page. http://wiki.kamijs.com/mobile_and_w3c_widgets > > > > > > > > Allowing access to the internet depends on the widget > > standard you choose. Check the W3C standard proposal as an > > example: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-access-20091208/ > > > > > > Or the Opera standard (although Opera widgets will be > > discontinued): > http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-widgets-specification-fourth-ed/#xml_security_access > > > > > > Again, this is something which should be discussed on the > > mobile OpenLaszlo mailing list: > > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile > > > > > > - Raju > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Founder > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have an dhtml app running fine on the web as SOLO > > in any browser, Now for ubuntu I want to deploy it > > as a widget: > > > > Opera or W3W? What is the difference? > > > > The main issue is, that my app reads xml from the > > server. The widget is set to read from the internet, > > if you will. > > Issue now is after installing the app as widget, > > that it does not get its data from the internet as > > when it runs in > > the browser. > > > > So, flash and dhtml have the rule set that all stuff > > must be in the same folder. How do you interpret > > this for an > > widget on your desktop.. Must lazlo tomcat run in > > the background or what? How do I make the app as > > widget > > obtain its data via TCP?! > > > > Best, > > Duke2010 > > > > PS: OL is cool, but "tricky.." > > > > > > -- > > Sent from Ubuntu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
