Great work, Frank! I can confirm the size improvement, and will do some tests with the app I'm working on at the moment.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:07 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice work! That's quite an improvement in file sizes. > > On 2012-03-13, at 22:54, Frank Guo wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> In last weeks, I had optimized OL HTML version. >> I have change some code of compiler, reduce the output js file size about >> 20%. >> After the rough testing, it works well. Hope you can try the last build. >> >> I am planning next steps to optimize the DHTML version. I think if I can >> improve the performance of current OL DHTML version, it will benefit for all >> the current OL applications. >> >> I'd like to collect the suggestions from all of you. >> If you have any ideas , please tell me. >> >> I paste the comparing result here. >> >> File Size Compare >> >> Application SWF DHTML >> >> >> >> >> >> Old New Old New >> >> >> >> >> >> Calendar Demo 401K 402K 633k uncompressed application 422K >> uncompressed application >> >> >> >> >> >> Amazon 458K 461K 984K uncompressed application 568k >> uncompressed application >> >> >> >> >> >> LZPIX 568K 570K 439k uncompressed application 269k uncompressed >> application >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards >> Frank Guo >> >> >> >> > >
