On Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:20:42 +1000 (EST), Ross Moore wrote:
>You can suppress this mini-TOC by putting
> \tableofchildlinks[off]
>within the material appearing on that HTML page.
>(load \usepackage{html} for this command to be defined.)
Oh sometimes things are just to obvious ;) (it works)
Am I right that I can't use it in the preamble to work for the whole document? At
least with me than I have still the child_lines in the document. I managed to change
latex2html
main script and frame.pl so the are not there when I don't have any entries between
them.
>Why is this a problem ?
>I'm sure a lot of thought went into designing it this way,
>concerning the appearance of large TOCs in browsers.
>Show me an example that looks wrong, if you think it should be changed.
(I depend on other peoples point of view) (I must admit that it looks alright with
netscape and MSIE)
Another question I have is this, when one creates a document with frames where no
footnotes are in, then latex2html still creates the footnoteframe but the contents of
the
footnoteframe is a directorylisting. Ok I found in frame.pl the 'sub
make_frame_header'
#if (($has_footref)&&(!$NO_FOOTNODE)) {
if (!$NO_FOOTNODE) {
local($footheight) = ($has_footref ? $FOOTNOTE_HEIGHT : '15pt');
# If there are footnote refs: 3 frames
$frameset
= "<FRAMESET ROWS=\"$NAVIGATION_HEIGHT,*,$footheight\""
. $NO_BORDER . '>';
# The footnote frame is called "footer"; its contents come from $footfile.
$footframe =
"<FRAME SRC=\"$footfile\" NAME=\"footer\" SCROLLING=\"auto\">"
} else {
# Otherwise: no footnote frame required -> only 2 frames.
$frameset = "<FRAMESET ROWS=\"$NAVIGATION_HEIGHT,*\""
. $NO_BORDER . '>';
$footframe = "";
}
but it seems that $NO_FOOTNODE is not passed correctly to this function. And what is
the reason for not using (($has_footref)&&(!$NO_FOOTNODE)) at the beginning? It looks
to me as it would serve the purpose of putting a footnodeframe only on those pages
witch have footnodes much better.
Soeren
