> Hallo there!
> sorry that I am back again with a new problem. (I do a collection of formula
> for my friends in mechanical engineering.)
> I've a formula in a section-title like:
> \section{ force difference $F_{\mathit {Fg}}$}
> If I run l2h I get in the image file an image like
> $F_{\@mathit {Fg}}$%
> So LaTeX complains about the @.
>
> What shall I do? ...
Try using
\section{ force difference $F_{\protect\mathit {Fg}}$}
^^^^^^^^
> Meanwhile I have worked on the problem: it seems to be a latex one, since
> the \@mathit is the result of reading the .toc file.
Ooh; that is a sloppiness in LaTeX.
They should not allow expansion of macros such as \mathbf, \mathit, etc.
when writing-out into the .toc , .lof, etc.
BTW, what version of LaTeX are you using ?
Which release-date, and patch-level ?
>
> And another problem: The images are produced, there is no problem. The most
> of them are correct. But some of the images contents the wrong formular,
> they contain the same as another formula e.g. img50 contains the same as
> img35 also it is compleatly different. If I delete img50 and run l2h again,
> the image is now correct. I had a look at the original ps-files, they are
> correct.
> What do I wrong?
Hmm. Can you send me an example where this happens.
I'd guess that LaTeX2HTML has a subtle assumption that the same image
will be used as when that text is encountered in the body of the document.
That clearly is not happenning here, so you get a link to the wrong image.
I'll need to do some testing and devise a fix for this.
> Thanks for answering
You're welcome.
Hope this helps,
Ross Moore
>
> Martin
> ## ## Martin Wolf
> #### # ## München, Germany
> ## ## ### ## <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ## ### #### http://www.familiewolf.de
>
>
>
>
>