Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > Bruce Miller writes: > > You've got no images that need to be sent too? > > That seems like an unusual scenario! > > Some of us have the specific goal that LaTeX2HTML doesn't generate any > images based on content document content. If you go a step further > and don't use separate image files for navigation, there's simply no > need for any at all. Whether that has any real impact on the > documents being processed depends on the domain. For the Python > documentation, there's almost no impact (there's not much need for > math displays). > > And in the special case of single-file outputs, there just isn't much > need for navigation images!
Yeah, I thought of that point, in the context of Ulrich's idea of connecting it to -split 0. And I can certainly see that you _can_ produce imageless files, in some domains, although I still think of it as at least somewhat unusual. So, it makes a little more sense as a separate option, although it probably doesn't matter much, and there'd be the weight of another option to contend with! _______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
