Hi Ross, > LaTeX2HTML just inputs the .bbl file that was created when > you processed your file with LaTeX + BibTeX, etc. > However, this happens *after* \input files have been interpolated > into the full job. This means that your use of \input within > the bibliography is interpreted as an unknown command, which is > then passed over to LaTeX to interpret -- hence the image.
Well. I assume that there is no way to make LaTeX2HTML
interpolate \input inside the .bbl file?
> \begin{thebibliography}{99}
> ... put the .bbl file's contents here ...
> \end{thebibliography}
> [...]
> \begin{thebibliography}{99}
> \input{<filename>.bbl}
> \end{thebibliography}
\begin{thebibliography} and \end{thebibliography} is not required
since it's already in the .bbl.
You mean I should leave the \bibliography{<filename>} out, use
sed to add \bibdata{} to the .aux and then simply input the .bbl?
Doesn't work: I'm getting a nice bibliography in the PDF output
(same as before) but references in the HTML output look like
[#!weber:success_of_os!#] and there's no bibliography at all.
Is there a way to insert commands into the .tex file that are
only interpreted by LaTeX2HTML?
Best,
J. Tobias
--
"The GNU philosophy is about freedom. To be free one must have
personal power. Personal power is an individual thing, difficult to
obtain and quick to perish." -- Krisno Pryosusilo
pgpB79XqYI00Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list [email protected] http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
