Hello, In node « Math miscellany », it is mentioned that « \* » produces a « discretionary » multiplication symbol. I tried the following example to see what it looks like (between B and E at the very end of formula):
--8<----8<----8<----8<----8<-- begin -->8---->8---->8---->8---->8---- \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \[A \times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B \* E \] \end{document} --8<----8<----8<----8<----8<-- end -->8---->8---->8---->8---->8---- but: - despite the overfull hbox there is not any line break - there is not any explicit multiplication symbol as such between B and E. - not clear what « at which » means, is that immediately _before_ or immediately _after_ the symbol that a line break is allowed Ok « discretionary » means that LaTeX is free to decide about something --- but it is not clear either exactly what is in the discretion of LaTeX, is that to produce or not an explicit symbol, or is that to make or not a line break. As far as I can understand, « discretionary symbol » would mean that the symbol is either produced or not... I made this other experiment: --8<----8<----8<----8<----8<-- begin -->8---->8---->8---->8---->8---- \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \noindent\(A \times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B \* E \) \noindent\(A \times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B\times B \* E \) \end{document} --8<----8<----8<----8<----8<-- end -->8---->8---->8---->8---->8---- Here I am using in-line math, not display math, and between the first and the second paragraph there is only one more B factor. There is a line break only in the 2nd paragraph, but not between B and E, and still not any explicit symbol. Any clarification welcome --- impossible to translate something that you can't understand in the first place :-/ VBR, Vincent