Martin Pool wrote: > 2009/8/14 Matthew Revell <[email protected]>: >> I think that's the hard part. A manually updated system status page >> could quickly become inaccurate. Can't we automate it somehow? > > Automation is very nice, but this spec has been waiting a long time, > and there have been multiple unexpected critical outages in the > interim. They confuse users and make the system look more flaky than > it actually is. > > What I'm suggesting is a page that describes only known critical outages. > > We don't need automation to add things to that page because by > definition if they're known, they have someone's attention. We just > need to add this small step of updating the page to the critical > outage procedure. > > Similarly, when we either fix or downgrade the issue, we just need to > update it to say so.
It would be great if this status page could also detail the status of automatic staging/edge rollouts - e.g. "AUTOMATIC (daily XX:XX UTC)" or "SUSPENDED (reason)". Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
