Hi guys, Right now the breadcrumbs and primary pillar for branches are quite broken. I don't mind fixing it, but I want some consensus on what we are wanting.
The way I look at it, we have several things to identify the primary pillar
and breadcrumbs for. Actually the primary pillar is pretty easy I think.
+junk branches, we use the owner
product branches we use the product
package branches we use what? Distribution? Or do we use source package?
Next we have breadcrumbs.
We have:
* +junk branches
e.g. for Eric the Viking
Eric the Viking (mainsite?) > Branches (code) > branch_name
* Product branches
e.g. for Gnome Terminal
Gnome Terminal (mainsite) > Branches (code) > branch_name
* Package branches - harder
e.g. for Ubuntu Karmic Evolution
Ubuntu (mainsite) > Karmic (mainsite or code?) > Evolution (mainsite or
code?) > branch_name
What about a merge proposal / code review for a branch? What does this add to
the breadcrumbs?
Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
