On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Karl Fogel<karl.fo...@canonical.com> wrote: > Jonathan Lange <j...@canonical.com> writes: >> I didn't know about the expensive/useless import problem -- it's a >> shame that a failure report wouldn't catch those. Still, I think that >> it's still a good idea to remove the approval process, even before we >> have a failure report web page or add svn repo heuristics. There are >> costs, but the benefit seems worth it. > > +1. > > If a vcs import produces no useful result, we'll hear about it if anyone > tries to use it; and if no one is trying to use it, then who cares? > > Also, failures that we hear about from users will motivate us (or even > the users?) to set up the reporting system. We should consider that an > eventual consequence of automatic approval, rather than a prerequisite. >
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/418932 Not assigned to anyone. jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
