= ReviewerMeeting20090826 = == summary ==
* we need to find a way to allow outside contributors to run branches through
ec2
* we need to open up lp-dev-utils project
== logs ==
=== ameu ===
{{{
26-08-2009 10:00:57 > barry: #startmeeting
26-08-2009 10:00:58 < mootbot!n=moot...@unaffiliated/mootbot: Meeting started
at 09:00. The chair is barry.
26-08-2009 10:00:58 < mootbot!n=moot...@unaffiliated/mootbot: Commands
Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
26-08-2009 10:01:16 > barry: hello everyone and welcome to this week's ameu
launchpad reviewer's meeting. who's here today?
26-08-2009 10:01:18 < bigjools!n=quas...@canonical/launchpad/bigjools: me
26-08-2009 10:01:19 < [email protected]: me
26-08-2009 10:01:20 < edwingrubbs!n=egru...@canonical/launchpad/edwingrubbs: me
26-08-2009 10:01:23 < noodles775!n=mi...@canonical/launchpad/noodles775: me
26-08-2009 10:01:31 < bac!n=...@canonical/launchpad/bac: me
26-08-2009 10:01:31 < deryck!n=der...@samba/team/deryck: me
26-08-2009 10:01:40 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: me
26-08-2009 10:01:59 < cprov!n=cp...@canonical/launchpad/cprov: me
26-08-2009 10:02:31 < [email protected]: me
26-08-2009 10:02:32 < [email protected]: me
26-08-2009 10:02:58 > barry: adeuring, leonardr, salgado ping
26-08-2009 10:03:02 < danilos!n=dan...@canonical/launchpad/danilos: me
26-08-2009 10:03:06 > barry: mars and sinzui send their apologies
26-08-2009 10:03:08 < salgado!n=salg...@canonical/launchpad/salgado: me
26-08-2009 10:03:11 < [email protected]: whoops, me
26-08-2009 10:03:14 -!- [email protected]
has joined #launchpad-meeting
26-08-2009 10:03:39 > barry: allenap: ping
26-08-2009 10:03:42 < leonardr!n=leona...@canonical/launchpad/leonardr: ping
26-08-2009 10:03:52 > barry: [TOPIC] agenda
26-08-2009 10:03:53 < mootbot!n=moot...@unaffiliated/mootbot: New Topic: agenda
26-08-2009 10:04:00 > barry: * Roll call
26-08-2009 10:04:00 > barry: * Action items
26-08-2009 10:04:00 > barry: * UI review call update
26-08-2009 10:04:00 > barry: * Peanut gallery (anything not on the agenda)
26-08-2009 10:04:03 > barry:
26-08-2009 10:04:06 > barry:
26-08-2009 10:04:10 > barry: [TOPIC] action items
26-08-2009 10:04:11 < mootbot!n=moot...@unaffiliated/mootbot: New Topic:
action items
26-08-2009 10:04:19 > barry: * beuno to add a 'ui' specialty to
ReviewerSchedule
26-08-2009 10:04:28 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: did not do it :(
26-08-2009 10:04:30 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: will do today
26-08-2009 10:04:32 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: PROMISE
26-08-2009 10:04:41 < [email protected]: me
26-08-2009 10:05:00 > barry: beuno: thanks! i was asked at our standup who our
mentors and mentats were and i just can't remember ;)
26-08-2009 10:05:13 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: UI mentor, just
me for now
26-08-2009 10:05:18 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: I will graduate
people
26-08-2009 10:05:32 > barry: cool
26-08-2009 10:05:50 > barry: * gary_poster and barry will transfer review
guidelines from the old wiki and old old wiki to the new wiki
26-08-2009 10:05:56 > barry: not done
26-08-2009 10:06:05 > barry: i will work on this this week
26-08-2009 10:06:16 > barry: [TOPIC] * UI review call update
26-08-2009 10:06:17 < mootbot!n=moot...@unaffiliated/mootbot: New Topic: * UI
review call update
26-08-2009 10:06:25 > barry: beuno: do you want to give an update?
26-08-2009 10:06:55 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: so
26-08-2009 10:07:00 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: we continued to
talk about what works and what doesn't
26-08-2009 10:07:12 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: and I have a lot
of notes that I need to update the wiki with
26-08-2009 10:08:40 > barry: beuno: how well do you think reviews are going
these days? how is ui 3.0 shaping up?
26-08-2009 10:08:59 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: I think they are
going very well
26-08-2009 10:09:02 -!- [email protected] has joined
#launchpad-meeting
26-08-2009 10:09:15 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: and that 3.0 is
shaping up much better than I expected
26-08-2009 10:09:15 < [email protected]: me
26-08-2009 10:09:29 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: developers are
very involved in taking decisions
26-08-2009 10:09:46 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: the navigation
changes are in place, which is a big one
26-08-2009 10:10:24 > barry: beuno: do you think we're going to hit our ui 3.0
deadline?
26-08-2009 10:10:46 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: barry, I don't
think well hit 100% of the pages for Sept
26-08-2009 10:10:49 < beuno!n=be...@canonical/launchpad/beuno: but pretty close
26-08-2009 10:11:35 > barry: cool. beuno anything else, or does anybody have
any other questions or issues about ui reviews?
26-08-2009 10:13:42 > barry: okay, moving on...
26-08-2009 10:13:48 > barry: [TOPIC] peanut gallery
26-08-2009 10:13:49 < mootbot!n=moot...@unaffiliated/mootbot: New Topic:
peanut gallery
26-08-2009 10:14:01 > barry: any other topics not on the agenda?
26-08-2009 10:15:04 > barry: 5
26-08-2009 10:15:06 > barry: 4
26-08-2009 10:15:09 > barry: 3
26-08-2009 10:15:12 > barry: 2
26-08-2009 10:15:14 > barry: 1
26-08-2009 10:15:32 > barry: cool. thanks everyone, and thanks for all the
great reviewing everyone's doing.
26-08-2009 10:15:34 > barry: #endmeeting
}}}
=== asiapac ===
{{{
26-08-2009 18:54:05 > barry: #startmeeting
26-08-2009 18:54:06 < mootbot!n=moot...@unaffiliated/mootbot: Meeting started
at 17:54. The chair is barry.
26-08-2009 18:54:06 < mootbot!n=moot...@unaffiliated/mootbot: Commands
Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
26-08-2009 18:54:27 > barry: jml, thumper, rockstar, mwhudson hi! welcome to
this week's asiapac reviewer's meeting. how are you guys doing?
26-08-2009 18:54:31 < thumper!n=quas...@canonical/launchpad/thumper: here
26-08-2009 18:54:40 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: hello
26-08-2009 18:54:41 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: ni!
26-08-2009 18:54:44 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: hello
26-08-2009 18:54:44 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: I'm well thank you
26-08-2009 18:54:55 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: rockstar, when did you
move to asiapac?
26-08-2009 18:55:00 < * mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson is under an
email molehill rather than a mountain
26-08-2009 18:55:04 > barry: jml: settling into your new position yet?
26-08-2009 18:55:25 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, "settling", hmm
not quite
26-08-2009 18:55:28 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: New position?
26-08-2009 18:55:34 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, I'm more like a
pioneer on my long trek west
26-08-2009 18:55:39 > barry: rockstar: joined us here a few weeks ago
26-08-2009 18:55:41 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, to borrow a
myth from your country :)
26-08-2009 18:55:45 > barry: :)
26-08-2009 18:56:01 > barry: wgrant: welcome!
26-08-2009 18:56:07 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: jml,
this way, I can get my morning chores done in the morning.
26-08-2009 18:56:23 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Morning barry.
26-08-2009 18:56:42 > barry: so... not much really to speak of in the ameu
meeting
26-08-2009 18:57:17 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, the public
announcement should come out soon
26-08-2009 18:57:19 > barry: beuno updated the ReviewerSchedule page with the
ui mentats
26-08-2009 18:57:59 > barry: beuno is the only full fledged ui reviewer but he
is going to do some graduations soon
26-08-2009 18:58:10 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: barry:
anything happen in reviewer meeting land in the last 3 weeks?
26-08-2009 18:58:20 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: barry: jml
and i haven't been here
26-08-2009 18:58:29 > barry: mwhudson: not much really. we've been having very
short meetings in both timezones
26-08-2009 18:58:41 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: barry: hooray
26-08-2009 18:59:13 > barry: so, i'll just open up the floor. what's on
y'all's mind today?
26-08-2009 18:59:29 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: "gosh, we
get a lot of email"
26-08-2009 19:00:14 > barry: mwhudson: heh
26-08-2009 19:00:30 > * barry laughs when he hears of people complaining about
a few hundred messages a day
26-08-2009 19:00:51 < * jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml thinks...
26-08-2009 19:01:11 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: any feedback from
non-Canonical contributors about the review process?
26-08-2009 19:01:23 > * barry looks at wgrant
26-08-2009 19:01:33 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: i guess i
can take the opportunity to do a little survey
26-08-2009 19:01:42 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: barry: Working well
for me.
26-08-2009 19:02:14 > barry: i'll just say again that it is /fantastic/ to see
yours and others from the community landing branches
26-08-2009 19:02:28 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: It's great to
finally be able to!
26-08-2009 19:03:05 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: as build
engineer for the next cycle, what's causing you, the developer, the most pain?
26-08-2009 19:03:07 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: My only slight
issue is that sponsors are often unclear on how to do things.
26-08-2009 19:03:10 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Is this not
documented?
26-08-2009 19:03:24 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: mwhudson: 'build
engineer'?
26-08-2009 19:03:34 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wasn't that
announcement on launchpad-dev!
26-08-2009 19:03:48 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: No. We don't find
anything out.
26-08-2009 19:03:50 > barry: wgrant: can you elaborate?
26-08-2009 19:03:58 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: bah
26-08-2009 19:04:06 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: and the wiki
page is internal
26-08-2009 19:04:12 < * jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml frowns
26-08-2009 19:04:14 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: still
learning at this sort of thing it seems :)
26-08-2009 19:04:44 > barry: yep. old habits die hard, but we're really trying
to move more and more resources, communications, etc. into the public square
26-08-2009 19:04:51 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: barry: Well, some
of my sponsors have had trouble working out how to ec2test my branches. I'm not
sure why.
26-08-2009 19:05:09 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: What was this email
meant to contain?
26-08-2009 19:05:25 > barry: mwhudson: we really should find a way for
non-Canonicals to run ec2
26-08-2009 19:05:27 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: we're going to have a
build engineer position
26-08-2009 19:05:34 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: barry: +inf
26-08-2009 19:05:35 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: it's a rotating
postiition
26-08-2009 19:05:51 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: "Each
development cycle, a different engineer will be taken off his normal
development duty, and have has main focus for the cycle the development and
well being of the build system. "
26-08-2009 19:05:52 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: the build engineer
works on making developers lives more pleasant, essentially
26-08-2009 19:06:03 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Aha. I see.
26-08-2009 19:06:15 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: i'm the
first one, starting officially on monday
26-08-2009 19:06:17 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, in answer to
your question
26-08-2009 19:06:26 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: i'm probably
going to tackle some buildbot annoyances first
26-08-2009 19:06:36 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: jml: you
sent me an email about this that i haven't read yet :)
26-08-2009 19:06:46 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: mwhudson: Bonus
points for making it public.
26-08-2009 19:06:57 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: wgrant:
yeah, that should be possible
26-08-2009 19:07:01 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, my email
wasn't so much about my pain points, actually :)
26-08-2009 19:08:00 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, it takes way
too long to land branches; buildbot should only send emails that require
action; test failures in devel break ec2test runs
26-08-2009 19:08:08 > barry: jml, mwhudson what is the main hold up to allowing
the public to run ec2? is it the payment issue?
26-08-2009 19:08:24 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: barry: i
imagine so
26-08-2009 19:08:41 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: also ec2test
is still private i think, but that will change soon (?)
26-08-2009 19:09:05 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, not a pain
point for me, but one I've had to watch: it takes too long to get set up with a
dev env
26-08-2009 19:09:46 > barry: surely we can find a way to subsidize the ec2
costs. it's gotta be trivial in the scheme of things. i usually feel guilty
expensing it every quarter
26-08-2009 19:09:48 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, the main
meta issue is that it's really hard to see what the status of various
build-related projects are (e.g. buildbot going public, ec2test going public,
etc)
26-08-2009 19:10:17 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: barry,
when we have a UEC set up in the data center, it might be easier. *shrug*
26-08-2009 19:10:27 > barry: rockstar: good point
26-08-2009 19:10:33 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: jml: i think
A build engineer, though probably not me, should focus on getting buildbot
running the test suite in parallel across several instances
26-08-2009 19:10:45 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, I very
strongly agree.
26-08-2009 19:11:13 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar:
mwhudson, abentley and I had a discussion about test layers today, and whether
or not we're really using the layers properly.
26-08-2009 19:11:45 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: I find
I spend a lot of time setting up and tearing down the test harnesses just to
run one test (that usually runs in shorter time than set up or tear down.
26-08-2009 19:11:51 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: rockstar: i
would claim that using layers correctly is close to impossible, but maybe
that's a bit bigoted
26-08-2009 19:12:07 > barry: rockstar: i can almost bet we're not. the layers
are horribly named and it is not intuitive to know what layer a test should go
in
26-08-2009 19:12:39 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: rockstar:
there's also the terrible way we start daemons in tests, that doesn't help
26-08-2009 19:12:40 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: barry,
yeah, GoogleServiceLayer and LibrarianLayer were two we identified as not
really necessary for most of our tests.
26-08-2009 19:12:41 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: switching to
testresources would help here
26-08-2009 19:12:47 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: +1 jml
26-08-2009 19:12:50 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: I'm a little terrified
about the work involved
26-08-2009 19:12:52 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: jml, +1
26-08-2009 19:12:55 > barry: rockstar: and they take a long time to start
26-08-2009 19:13:04 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: but maybe if we
actually explored what needed to happen, it would be less terrifying
26-08-2009 19:13:08 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: barry,
yeah, which is basically what I spent much of yesterday doing.
26-08-2009 19:13:11 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: librarian takes
forever!
26-08-2009 19:13:37 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, indeed.
26-08-2009 19:13:37 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: wgrant,
this morning it took 15.391 seconds to start up, and 7.3 seconds to tear down
the librarian.
26-08-2009 19:13:48 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, so, that's
not really a survey, since it's just me :)
26-08-2009 19:14:13 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: rockstar: It's
about twice as fast here, most of the time.
26-08-2009 19:14:25 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar:
mwhudson, really, if I had a pony request, it'd be a graph for how long the
test suite is taking, and maybe some mini graphs of different sections of the
test.
26-08-2009 19:14:27 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: for all
that, step 1 is still going to be force build on buildbot
26-08-2009 19:14:34 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: rockstar:
that's a good idea
26-08-2009 19:14:58 < * jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml agrees -- it's in an
email I sent :)
26-08-2009 19:15:10 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: jml,
dammit. You and your organization...
26-08-2009 19:15:33 -!- [email protected]
has quit ["Leaving"]
26-08-2009 19:15:42 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: Do we
have a place to aggregate all of these ideas?
26-08-2009 19:15:47 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: exactly!
26-08-2009 19:16:00 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: jml,
did you send an email about that too?
26-08-2009 19:16:07 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: I was about to say,
step 0 should really be tracking this.
26-08-2009 19:16:11 > barry: rockstar: like a wiki? <wink>
26-08-2009 19:16:14 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: rockstar, it was in
the same email as the graph stuff :)
26-08-2009 19:16:29 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: barry,
wikis are TERRIBLE issue trackers.
26-08-2009 19:16:30 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, or, umm, a bug
tracker.
26-08-2009 19:16:38 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, I've got this
good one I can sell you
26-08-2009 19:16:46 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: I know
these really great guys who spend a lot of time writing a bug tracker...
26-08-2009 19:16:49 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: step -1:
move BE wiki pages to dev.lp.net
26-08-2009 19:16:53 > barry: :)
26-08-2009 19:17:00 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, \o/
26-08-2009 19:17:12 < mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: step 0: a
tag in launchpad-project, i guess
26-08-2009 19:17:35 < rockstar!n=rocks...@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: Maybe a
product in launchpad-project.
26-08-2009 19:17:38 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Wouldn't a separate
product be much better?
26-08-2009 19:17:53 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: rockstar, wgrant,
maaybe
26-08-2009 19:18:10 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: I don't think that the
way Launchpad uses products is the way Launchpad wants others to use products
though
26-08-2009 19:18:26 < * jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml makes a note about
that
26-08-2009 19:18:26 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: No.
26-08-2009 19:18:30 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: But this one is
different.
26-08-2009 19:19:10 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, yeah, I think
so too, but I'm not sure how it's different.
26-08-2009 19:19:27 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: jml: It's not part
of the codebase.
26-08-2009 19:19:37 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, some of the
bugs are in the code base
26-08-2009 19:19:38 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Most of the other
products are.
26-08-2009 19:19:40 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Hmm.
26-08-2009 19:19:48 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, but a
subproduct would fit there, I guess
26-08-2009 19:20:11 < * mwhudson!n=...@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson writes
another thing down, "make sure buildbot config is in a branch or two on
launchpad"
26-08-2009 19:20:16 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: the secret,
proprietary project with all of our developer utilities might well belong as a
public sub-project of Launchpad
26-08-2009 19:20:35 > barry: jml: +1
26-08-2009 19:20:45 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: jml: lp-dev-utils,
or is there something else?
26-08-2009 19:20:52 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, lp-dev-utils,
yes.
26-08-2009 19:21:10 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, that is, I can
neither confirm nor deny the existence of said project...
26-08-2009 19:21:26 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Heh.
26-08-2009 19:21:42 < * wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant whines about the
product/project/project/projectgroup confusion.
26-08-2009 19:21:50 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: patches accepted :)
26-08-2009 19:22:02 > barry: wgrant: beuno just today told me i could jfdi
(rename those things :)
26-08-2009 19:22:14 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: either that, or
sabotage barry's bass so he gets some more free time
26-08-2009 19:22:23 > barry: jml: that is so cruel
26-08-2009 19:22:27 < wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Heh.
26-08-2009 19:22:46 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, all you need
to do is add an extra string -- it'll baffle him
26-08-2009 19:22:49 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, <3
26-08-2009 19:23:04 > barry: jml: ouch :)
26-08-2009 19:23:09 > barry: does that mean we're done here?
26-08-2009 19:23:13 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: I think so.
26-08-2009 19:23:34 > barry: wgrant, rockstar, mwhudson anything else?
26-08-2009 19:23:45 < * wgrant!n=wgr...@ubuntu/member/wgrant can think of
nothing more to whinge about.
26-08-2009 19:24:12 > barry: 5
26-08-2009 19:24:12 > barry: 4
26-08-2009 19:24:14 > barry: 3
26-08-2009 19:24:15 > barry: 2
26-08-2009 19:24:18 > barry: 1
26-08-2009 19:24:21 < jml!n=...@canonical/launchpad/jml: Thunderbirds are go!
26-08-2009 19:24:21 > barry: #endmeeting
}}}
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
