On Oct 7, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Julian Edwards wrote:
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:41:40 Curtis Hovey wrote:On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 14:21 +0200, Michael Nelson wrote:Hi all,Yet another breadcrumb/heading question :) Basically, which is better:Option 1: low redundancy: H1: Define upstream link BC: Ubuntu >> 9.04 >> “mozilla-firefox” source package >> Define upstream link or Option 2: redundancy and possibly google-fu (h1 being weighted?) H1: Define upstream link for mozilla-firefox in Ubuntu Jaunty BC: Ubuntu >> 9.04 >> “mozilla-firefox” source package >> Define upstream linkI prefer option 1 because I think option 2 obscures the breadcrumb.Me too, for the same reason. I've never liked pages that have this sort of H1and BC combo, it feels like the page hasn't been thought out properly.
I can see benefits to both, but the brevity wins out, so I'd say I'm +0 on option 1.
-Barry
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
