-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Edwards wrote: > If there's any chance of benefiting from aggregation of cumulative updates > then you're always going to end up doing something that smells like polling > one way or another.
I don't think that that the system I described in my response smells like polling. The responsiveness of the system I described is much more consistent than polling-- both have an average delay of 30s, but with messaging it's *always* 30s, instead of 0-60s with polling. It also takes better advantage of cumulative updates than polling, making it more efficient. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrPc9oACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI1k2wCZAfbKiFf2yKNY8r6tKehvkEVH e4oAnAxsA323JxUFz7UuHoG/rN5BeyWY =JphQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
