On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 13:55 -0500, David Farning wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Curtis Hovey > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 19:55 -0500, David Farning wrote: > >> I am looking at setting up a launchpad instance for Sugar Labs[1]. > >> There is a good chance that we will use the canonical hosted services. > >> Like any paranoid sysadmin, I want to be able to host our own > >> instance if necessary. > > > > I think that is a violation of the rules. I think there are assets that > > cannot be used to host a public instance. You need to remove/replace > > many non-essential parts. > > Can you explain this more fully? Launchpad sales is saying the > organizations can set up external instances.... But it is easier and > more cost effective to have Canonical host the instance.
The code is AGPL, the images are not: https://dev.launchpad.net/LaunchpadLicense You can run an instance with the non-AGPL parts for development and testing purposes. Launchpad is designed to allow a community of users collaborate across projects. It is open source so that the community can vet or extend the application to meet its needs. Running a single instance divides the community, so it is not in the interest of Launchpad engineers to to encourage users setting up their own Launchpads. -- __Curtis C. Hovey_________ http://launchpad.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
