On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:56:30 Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 2, 2009, at 8:15 PM, Ian Clatworthy wrote: > > My personal opinion is that Launchpad the product is a project, not a > > project group. For large projects, we need a level of granularity > > below > > the 'project' called 'components' say (ala JIRA). Tags are the closest > > thing we have right now and, while useful, they're not as helpful > > w.r.t. > > partitioning. > > This feels more right than anything I've heard so far, and it would > also be more scalable in the sense that projects of many different > sizes (not just "large") would be able to utilize such components. > It's a fairly common organizational tool in many bug trackers. > > -Barry
Yeah, components have come up a number of times, but nothing has ever been done about them. I think due to lack of resources and other priorities rather than a general dislike. Tim _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
