On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Michael Nelson < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Michael Hudson < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> Julian Edwards wrote: >> > There is one nightmare part to this - the implementation of >> > IBuilder.findBuildCandidate(). This is currently a very ugly query that >> > decides which job to dispatch next, based on a few criteria about the >> jobs. I >> > expect it to get to troll-like ugliness by the time we finish and I'm >> not sure >> > how it will work yet, it depends on how Michael re-factors IBuilder and >> sets >> > up an interface that other builders must implement. >> >> Wow, that's a beauty alright. >> >> > Hmm... as far as I understand it, we aren't going to have generalised > builders that can do both binary-package building and branch->source package > building initially right? Rather, we'll have different types of builders. So > although we'll want to keep the scoring consistent for both so that when we > *do* have such infrastructure they'll be queued fairly, currently each > builder type will be able to implement its own findBuildCandidate() and only > be looking for builds of the required type... in which case, the short-term > solution for findBuildCandidate() should be pretty straight forward? > > Erm - my mistake. We won't yet have generalised builders that can accept jobs for different archs, but any builder should be able to do branch jobs (ie. non soyuz-build jobs). > -Michael. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
