-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bjorn Tillenius wrote: > As I see it, the with statement is > mainly useful wehre you have a well-known behaviour, where it's easy to > find out what's going on (for example from the name), or when the > clean-up step isn't important.
Why do you say "when the clean-up step isn't important"? > This doesn't mean that we should avoid > writing our own context managers at all cost, just that we should > evaluate the benefit. I agree, but a with statement that eliminates boilerplate code will usually have sufficient benefit to me. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkty82cACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI2d9gCeMqGrS7luHeVZV8wPg6+mWSxH aTYAni9olQHvQrqZMG0nHu0gms/xof20 =AvSw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
