Nobody replied yet. +1 on using basic auth for me. I like having the test openid provider on a separate domain, and this limitation doesn't seem too bad, at least for now..
Gary On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a branch on which I changed the +login page to use OpenID, and > when developing or testing it uses testopenid.lp.dev as the provider. > > That's a problem for windmill tests because windmill can't cleanly > switch between domains[1], so I thought of using HTTP basic auth > (+basiclogin) instead, which works ok in this case as our tests don't > switch between domains anyway. Does anybody see that as a problem in > any way? > > An alternative would be to not use a separate vhost for the testopenid > provider, but that would make it slightly trickier to disable the test > provider in production -- when using a separate vhost it's very easy to > do that. > > [1] I tried really hard to make it possible to login using the test > OpenID provider in windmill tests and almost succeeded (with a few hacks > here and there), but in the end I wasn't sure it'd be possible at all, > so I gave up. <http://trac.getwindmill.com/ticket/279> > > > -- > Guilherme Salgado <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
