On Feb 11, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Ian Clatworthy wrote: >Sometimes the fastest way to improve quality is to simply fix lots of >bugs. The primary argument against doing that is opportunity cost: could >the time be better spent on delivering new features instead? That's >never an easy call. I think your templates are great for new features. >If fixing small bugs takes too long though, then that process needs to >be improved IMO. I'd be hesitant to impose additional overhead on small >changes.
Something to keep in mind, IMO, is the great success we had with LP 3.0. I think there will always be grumblings when you change anything (witness Facebook ;), but with my upstream hat on, I think LP 3.0 was an enormous positive leap in usability. Everyone was lazr (sorry :) focused on a common task and we fixed tons of little bugs. In hindsight it also seemed really pretty agile, at least once we got going. Let's do more of that. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
