On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Edwin Grubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Jonathan Lange <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Curtis Hovey <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 07:52 -0600, Edwin Grubbs wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Martin Pool <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > On 4 March 2010 16:32, Edwin Grubbs <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> I would appreciate any feedback on this proposal for displaying users >>>> >> which services are unconfigured. This is very closely related to the >>>> >> proposal that Curtis emailed with the subject "RFC Changing >>>> >> permissions to allow contributors to set upstream information", but >>>> >> this document is only concerned with the project index page. >>>> >> >> >> Thanks for this Edwin. Sorry I've taken so long to get to replying. >> >> A couple of quick thoughts: >> * we should just drop "Register a blueprint" from the "Get involved" box >> * what would clicking on the "Bugs" tab show for a project that has >> "Report a bug" crossed out on the "Get involved" box? similarly for >> Translations etc. > > > Why would we remove the "Register a blueprint" link from the "Get > involved" portlet?
It's orthogonal to this discussion, but... - hardly anyone uses blueprints (see https://lpstats.canonical.com/graphs/KarmaBreakdownGlobalWeek/20070601/20100312/) - I want to see if anyone complains if we remove the link - Why do we want to have it there? > Right now, the tabs show some info on activating > usage of the service, if the user has permission to do that. As in, this is the current behaviour of Launchpad? I guess I should actually test this. > The one > exception is the Branch tab, on which you can register a branch > without any prior configuration to activate the service. Therefore, > graying out the "Submit a branch" link in the "Get involved" portlet > just serves the purpose of advising the user whether the upstream code > base is readily available. > That makes sense. ... >> Can I encourage you to turn this into a LEP and add it to >> https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP (I've recovered from my blueprints >> insanity)? > > > I have converted the page into a LEP. The scope has been narrowed and > new mockups have been added, so it is worth rereading. > > https://dev.launchpad.net/Registry/InvolvementPortletRefactor > Thanks! I'll take a look. jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
