On 30 March 2010 20:49, Jonathan Lange <[email protected]> wrote: > The LEP did say this in its way, but I've updated it to be extra explicit.
Thanks, it looks very clear now. >> istm you would like it to normally appear in user-oriented >> searches (filebug dupes) but not in developer-oriented lists. >> > > I think this is a helpful distinction. I wonder if we even have a > structure for this in the tracker. I'm not sure this needs to block implementation but it probably does need to be thought about. If the bug is totally hidden then people may keep filing new dupes. I don't know what fraction of the developer pain typically comes from dupes vs ongoing discussion. otoh the +filebug dupefinder seems to be pretty much mandatory these days and it does match closed bugs, so perhaps nothing more is needed. -- Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
