On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:09:57 Martin Pool wrote: > On 7 July 2010 00:23, Francis J. Lacoste <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually, > > > > That's not correct. We run the latest revision of lp:~launchpad- > > pqm/loggerhead/devel > > > > So landing on lp:loggerhead aren't deployed until somebody pushes/merge > > them to that other branch. > > OK, that's a useful correction. > > (I don't think calling the deployment branch 'devel' is the best > naming decision ever. ;-) > > The point remains though that there is no production-like testing of > changes until they are rolled out everywhere. If we make a mistake in > what goes into lp:~launchpad-pqm/loggerhead/devel, that will only be > detected when it's live for everybody - at which point I suppose we > can roll back to the previous version. If everybody working on or > supporting loggerhead is ok with this then it's ok with me.
OK, not entirely true. We do have a staging loggerhead. Although actually doing the testing is a bit more of an issue as we don't have (many) *real* branches on staging to test against. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
