We should support: * The latest stable release (what LP devs use) * The latest LTS release (what the server should be running) * The LTS release in production (because sometime, like now, that's now actually the latest LTS release) * The latest development release (because many Ubuntu dev are actually running that, and the LP dev upgrade at beta time)
-- Francis J. Lacoste [email protected] On July 23, 2010, Julian Edwards wrote: > On Thursday 22 July 2010 16:00:17 Max Bowsher wrote: > > I think the time has come to officially de-support Jaunty as a Launchpad > > development platform. > > > > It now has only 3 months to run before EOL, and I doubt anyone would > > deem it worthwhile to spend time on validating the > > launchpad-messagequeue-dependencies stack there. > > > > If there are no objections, please would a ~launchpad member delete all > > Jaunty publications from the Launchpad PPA to clearly represent this / > > avoid potential confusion. > > Let's ask another question - why are we supporting anything other than the > latest LTS and the latest stable release? > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
