On 08/09/2010 04:34 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > I think this is basically a fine idea, however what would be the > implications of being more extreme and not rolling out to shipit during > Launchpad rollouts? Then we could just forget about shipit, something > we'd all be happy about I think.
This alternative has been suggested too, by Gary, I think. > > The obvious risk is that database changes might break shipit, but as it > accesses an entirely (I think) distinct set of tables to Launchpad, this > probably isn't too bad. The risk for what you propose is low but I my proposal is not much work and doesn't have the same (minimal) exposure. --bac _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
